美国保育学论文怎么写：道德陈述和道德义务 The strong and weak divine command theory can be useful to understand the Euthyphro dilemma and its implication. The stronger version of the divine command theory contends that moral statements and moral obligations are seen to be defined in terms of theological statements or the commandments of God. This strong version leaves no area for ambiguity. The interpretation of moral obligations is understood only in the context of God and no other. On the other hand, the weaker view is considered as one where God’s standpoint (the theological perspective) and the virtual standpoint coexist. A coextensive situation between both standpoints is considered here. God’s commands do not determine morality, but rather inform us about its content. I accept the weaker standpoint because it makes more sense to me in this area of rationalization. Commands of God are coextensive with the demands of morality. It can be understood that God does not in essence determine morality. It could be that his rules inform us better about morality. Moral obligations could be derived from the understanding of God’s rules.
美国保育学论文怎么写：道德陈述和道德义务 I think that the weaker standpoint is better because the weaker standpoint allows for a more broader understanding. If one were to consider that God was the origination of all moral stances, then it would mean that God would have to be called on for explanations about everything. Why do some moral actions lead to the hurt of others, why some actions although seemingly moral might lead to situations of questionable morality later or why do some seemingly moral people end up doing actions hurting others. There could be many questions which cannot be explained using the theological standpoint alone. On the other hand, understanding morality as being derived from the self can be best in some situation, but not others. We do have a inherent sense of morality in us that helps guide our actions, but this inherent sense of morality sometimes needs to rely on outside code or outside words in order to survive. Man alone might not be able to survive the moral content and codes in an ever-growing world of conflicts and god is needed as a factor to understand such dilemmas.