The effect on the natural forest is not existing making it a more reliable project. However, the pollution originating from the vehicular traffic daily, the waste water generated daily and its appropriate disposal and reduction in the city temperature resulting from reduction in green space are important matters which are not being considered in this case study. The environmental report which is awaited from the government is one of the hopes that it would consider all possible effects from the project and accordingly give a sanction or amend the design plan to reduce its negative effect. The project is also outside of the flood zone declared by the government which is as 500 km range and this project falls outside of that influence area of flood possibility. The proposal by the government to declare that no other alternative is available is questionable, because when no other alternative is available, it is not right to consider building a development which is already green and then you reduce the green cover from it. The development is fruitful as it considers the local residents interests of entertainment and provide more options to them, but the mere selection of the site based on certain non-availability of other sites is not legitimate. If there is no site available to develop, then soon the city will be deprived of its open spaces and people not having many options for them. The development is absolutely possible but the government must keep some restrictions on the development and the developer.